Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Dec 2011 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 499384
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-08
Well, that would be Vimeo being Vimeo.
After Chrome has dropped H.264, they will not even offer support for the majority of web browsers by using that video format. But re-encoding is oh-so costly for a website which can afford to distribute billions of high-quality videos per day at no cost, right ?
Edited 2011-12-08 07:12 UTC