Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Dec 2011 22:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 499496
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
I personally think that Microsoft will only limit or disable side-loading of Metro applications on mobile platforms, for business reasons obviously. But on the desktop it wouldn't make sense as there is no limit as to how large a Metro application can be and thus sometimes it would make more sense to distribute the application on physical media or download at another location and install from removable storage than to always have to download everything on the same computer you're going to be using it on. In the future more and more applications will be going Metro, including the large, professional ones, so Microsoft would only be shooting themselves in the foot by denying those from being distributed and installed the traditional way.
Now, I've seen some people claiming that Microsoft will eventually also disable the traditional ways for software packages to be distributed and install for the traditional non-Metro desktop.. well, that's not going to happen. To those people: if they did that they'd lose Steam, Origin, millions of brick'n'mortar game stores and so on as customers AND they'd have to actually start hosting all that stuff themselves.