Linked by snydeq on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:35 UTC
General Development Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister writes in favor of new programming languages given the difficulty of upgrading existing, popular languages. 'Whenever a new programming language is announced, a certain segment of the developer population always rolls its eyes and groans that we have quite enough to choose from already,' McAllister writes. 'But once a language reaches a certain tipping point of popularity, overhauling it to include support for new features, paradigms, and patterns is easier said than done.' PHP 6, Perl 6, Python 3, ECMAScript 4 -- 'the lesson from all of these examples is clear: Programming languages move slowly, and the more popular a language is, the slower it moves. It is far, far easier to create a new language from whole cloth than it is to convince the existing user base of a popular language to accept radical changes.'
Permalink for comment 499738
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do I agree or not?
by Alfman on Sun 11th Dec 2011 02:25 UTC
Alfman
Member since:
2011-01-28

I find myself agreeing with all this author's supporting evidence, and yet I'm leaning away from his conclusion. No, I don't think we need yet another new language syntax.

Personally I'd rather work on a way to make existing languages more interoperable to make the choice of languages less restrictive.

Reply Score: 5