Linked by snydeq on Sun 11th Dec 2011 01:35 UTC
General Development Fatal Exception's Neil McAllister writes in favor of new programming languages given the difficulty of upgrading existing, popular languages. 'Whenever a new programming language is announced, a certain segment of the developer population always rolls its eyes and groans that we have quite enough to choose from already,' McAllister writes. 'But once a language reaches a certain tipping point of popularity, overhauling it to include support for new features, paradigms, and patterns is easier said than done.' PHP 6, Perl 6, Python 3, ECMAScript 4 -- 'the lesson from all of these examples is clear: Programming languages move slowly, and the more popular a language is, the slower it moves. It is far, far easier to create a new language from whole cloth than it is to convince the existing user base of a popular language to accept radical changes.'
Permalink for comment 499755
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Do I agree or not?
by JAlexoid on Sun 11th Dec 2011 04:25 UTC in reply to "RE: Do I agree or not?"
Member since:

The ironic part is that without the standard libraries modern languages are useless. Any language is pretty much of the same effectiveness, when all standard libraries are removed from comparison.

Reply Parent Score: 2