Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Dec 2011 11:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 500750
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
shmerl,
I really didn't mean to suggest that samsung would be the aggressor, only that there would still be one. Not all companies find the patent troll business model appealing, though it can be hard to predict through the smoke and mirrors.
Ideally patent trolling wouldn't be viable, and money would be diverted back from all the wasteful lawsuits into productive R&D jobs and higher quality products.