Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Dec 2011 22:01 UTC, submitted by RichterKuato
Window Managers Gtk+ has GNOME on the one hand, and Xfce on the other. Qt, on the other hand, only has KDE - there's no lightweight, less encompassing alternative if KDE doesn't float your boat, but you'd still want a Qt desktop. Luckily for you, there's now Razor-qt, a small, lightweight and simple Qt desktop environment.
Permalink for comment 501065
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Nice
by Neolander on Fri 23rd Dec 2011 11:45 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Nice"
Neolander
Member since:
2010-03-08

Including when tapping into Qt's new animation capabilities ?

I know that the QML demos of Qt 4.7 are somewhat sluggish on the Fedora 15 install of my laptop, which offers a typical example of imperfect GPU support (Dual-GPU setup in which the Intel chip works reasonably well and the NVidia chip doesn't).

My problem with that is that as outdated as pre-Sandy Bridge Intel GPUs may be, I believe they still vastly outperform Mesa OpenGL emulation on CPUs for the same period. If you know of a simple way to temporarily disable GPU acceleration on Linux, I can experimentally test this belief.

So, unless Qt 5 has vastly improved rendering performance over Qt 4, what will happen when developers will start to put pretty animated transitions everywhere in their software, as is somewhat encouraged by the QML part of the Qt SDK ?

Reply Parent Score: 1