Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Dec 2011 18:59 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless I doubt Research In Motion really knew what hit them back when the iPhone launched. I doubt they really knew what hit them when Android steamrolled the smartphone market. And, today, I still doubt they really know what the heck they are supposed to do to turn their sinking ship around. Update: RIM contacted us with a statement on the matter - they state everything in the BGR article is wrong. Read on for the full statement.
Permalink for comment 501138
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?
by tony on Sat 24th Dec 2011 04:32 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Worse than iPhone iOS 1.0?"
Member since:


It's a cop out because those are all reasonable things to have a smart phone do without a computer, and you said you can just use a computer for the things your smartphone doesn't do well. You're answer, while being true, doesn't say anything to justify the shortcoming.

To exaggerate the point for effect, I could say it doesn't matter if my smart phone doesn't receive phone calls reliably because I can always take them on my land line. While the statement is true, it doesn't justify the deficiency.

Your answer was a cop out in the same way.

It would be a cop out if the iPhone can't do those things. But it can, and I just don't.

I mean, common, IRC? For direct messages, through SMS/BBM/iChat, it works fine. In a chat room? It's like saying you could write a novel on a smartphone. Yeah, you could, but why would you want to?

I can do Pandora on my iPhone (and in the background), but I don't. Maybe not a bad idea for when I'm running, but most of the time when I'm listening to music I'm on a plane. No Internet access. I usually use Pandora or if I'm sitting down and cranking out work. And that involves a laptop (although I've done a few articles on an iPad with a bluetooth keyboard).

Same with Skype.

So no, not a copout.

Edited 2011-12-24 04:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1