Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 31st Dec 2011 07:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 501780
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-22
Actually, you can't do that with JavaScript. As I mentioned the attacker just places an <img>-tag.
Well, I guess you can do that with JavaScript but it doesn't have any advantage over using an image.
They might use JavaScript to generate a long list of <img>-tags to try different IP-addresses though.
Just sending a longer HTML-page is easy too ofcourse.
So the only thing you are protecting yourself against in this case is an attacker which expects JavaScript to be available and working.