Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Jan 2012 19:12 UTC
Permalink for comment 501879
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-12-30
As a person living in a society -- even Richard Stallman does -- you need to have a minimum amount of implicit trust into everything that's around you. Trains, buses, planes, computer devices like ATMs or ticket machines, clocks, traffic lights.
You expect them to function correctly like the day before, every day. And since deviations from that are the exception and not the norm, it's justified to build up that trust.
If you can't do that -- trust your (computerized) environment to such a degree that makes routine possible, that is -- you will be unable to function in society.
It is unrealistic to imagine a scenario where a large amount or even the majority of people would indeed care about the code. If there'd be a widespread feeling of mistrust with regards to code, and in consequence with regards to everything computerized around you, you'd be unable to live normal lives. In other words: society would have collapsed.
I don't think that's an realistic option.