Linked by snydeq on Thu 5th Jan 2012 15:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 502311
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-22
Actually no, you are confused.
Microsoft made deals with large domain hosters to serve their 'parked domains' on IIS (generic page shown for domains 'without a website').
That way it would inflate the usage share of IIS on the Internet so organisations like Netcraft would end up publishing graphs more favorable to IIS.
So they didn't pay Netcraft, they gave some really large hosters 'marketing budget' or whatever they called it.
Those contracts probably ran out around 2009 judging by the graphs.