Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Jan 2012 10:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 502895
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-12
Here's where Thom eats his cake:
But oh, look, he still has it one line later:
No, no it totally does not vindicate any claim that open source is important; in fact it's direct evidence that open source is completely irrelevant, because it doesn't amount to anything more than a single ingredient in the mystery meat that is any sort of finished product.
(Unless you're speaking entirely hypothetically and have given up all illusions and equivocations that Android products and devices -- you know, Android in any meaningful sense -- were ever open to begin with. In which case, disregard: I only meant to discuss Things That Exist.)
Hacking an Android device is called rooting. Hacking an iOS device is called jailbreaking. Aside from the name, there's not much else different between them. No matter how much Android code you audit and compile yourself, you need to put the proprietary drivers back in if you want the phone to actually operate.
Android devices are not open, and being "more open" doesn't actually get you anywhere because you can't roll your own phone. Wake me up as soon as that changes.