Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jan 2012 23:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 503018
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-18
I'm not a fan of dictatorships. I've seen several instances of mods targeting specific users just because they disagreed with them. Ocassionally it blows up and a mod loses thier power, but not often, since mods often are tight with the site leadership. Also people are afraid of said mod taking it out on them, so they stay quiet.
I think the sort of... democracy you have here works much better. About the only change that might help those truly paranoid about fale negative votes, would be a free (once per user per post?) upvote category called "Not Trolling/Spam" that's only available on -1 posts. However, I don't think that's really necessary, as most -1 posts I've seen belong there, and the rest I'd upvote anyways.