Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Jan 2012 22:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 503163
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
It means someone don't know what they're talking about. "
Might want to also quote the bit that followed.
It means that the BSDs tend to be more conservative, developing along the lines of what they believe is the best long-term option to deliver a smooth developing path - even if that means not always having the latest and greatest features. Linux, on the other hand, takes a more pragmatic approach, and will happily settle for a less ideal option just to get the latest and greatest feature, even if that means having to do it all again shortly after. This is pretty basic stuff.
It had nothing to do with licenses. Settle down, people. Dear lord.