Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 16:20 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Permalink for comment 503298
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-12-15
Not that this is a direct example, but think about this, Microsoft is not doing anything different than apple. Apple requires that you buy their hardware, microsoft is requiring you use their OS on a piece of hardware. Sure you can run other operating systems on a mac, but I can't run OS X on another machine, I am forced into buying their hardware. They are a different issue but the same principal. Another example is the IPAD (aka competitor to windows arm tablets)...I can't put another OS on it, and does anyone complain no. Why should Microsoft always be the target? Apple is just as guilty... I think we need to stop blaming MS for all the Linux adoption issues, the real issue is its not sold by OEM's and not supported by hardware vendors, if drivers were all made equal we would see Linux all over the place.
Edited 2012-01-13 20:48 UTC