Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 16:20 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Permalink for comment 503499
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-06-10
Bad news I agree, as I want control of my device regardless of cpu architecture, but one thing that perked me up:
These new certification requirements show that MS is now MANDATING that secure boot must be able to be disabled by the user on the x86 platform - they weren't doing this before. It is important because it means - regardless of if Windows 8 will boot with it switched off - that any OEM PC will now definitely be able to boot Linux/*BSD as opposed to the 'maybe' situation we had before.
We still need to kick up a stink about this ARM nonsense, but at least the x86 platform will definitely remain open now.