Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jan 2012 22:45 UTC, submitted by bowkota
Permalink for comment 503507
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-24
No. Their pulling out of China was always of questionable value, IMO. It's the clever ways they came up with for *remaining* in China while circumventing the Great Firewall that were of the greatest value.
I would strongly argue that while pulling out makes a nice political or moral statement, you really can't address the problems in China without *engaging* in China.
We'll have to watch what happens and evaluate accordingly. The potential for future abuse of the concentration of data they hold (either by a future ownership/managerment, or by rogue employees) concerns me.
But for now, I think that Google itself, in its current incarnation is still golden.
Come on. Even if you don't agree with their actions in China today, when was the last time *you* faced off with one of the most powerful governments in the world?
-Steve