Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Jan 2012 20:57 UTC
Permalink for comment 503519
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
It is interesting that they didn't remove the link in the petition (mirrored below). It was obviously included to prove a point - that the administration's own website would be guilty under the provisions of SOPA.
http://i.imgur.com/TD4Kq.jpg
As my understanding goes, so long as the law was enforced without favoritism, whitehouse.gov would be subject to take down without a court order.