Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Jan 2012 20:57 UTC
Internet & Networking The Obama administration has responded to two petitions regarding SOPA, but in true political fashion, the response is 838 words of absolutely nothing at all. Here's a link, but don't complain to me about losing 10 minutes of your life reading this empty drivel. How about taking a stand for once, eh?
Permalink for comment 503583
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Excuse me, but...
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 16th Jan 2012 00:11 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Excuse me, but..."
Member since:

Thom.... it says what they are against in BOLD in the damn statement.

They do not have to say "we are against SOPA" since they are against all that is ACTUALLY BAD about SOPA and PIPA.

You fell for it.

The statement doesn't define anything. It doesn't have any 'hard' words in it. All it says is: "Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small."

Now go ask a SOPA-supporter if SOPA is about censorship or inhibiting innovation. They'll all claim it is not. See where this is going? Of course Obama is against censorship, but by not defining a hard line between "this is censorship" and "this is not censorship", he can sign SOPA into law without ever violating this statement. Obama has very close ties with the entertainment lobby (ask Biden), so he'll simply agree with Hollywood that SOPA is not about censorship, end of story.

If a political statement is released, look for 'hard' words, lines, definitions, etc. This statement has none. As such, it isn't even worth the bits it uses.

Reply Parent Score: 3