Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th Jan 2012 22:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 503614
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-11
I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.5 or 2.2.6, which is going back to the mid 90s sometime. My previous experience had been on Digital Unix, followed by Linux.
I've always liked FreeBSD better than Linux. Take this for what it's worth, one man's opinion. FreeBSD has always been much cleaner and spartan under the hood. Back in the day there was a demonstrable performance edge with FreeBSD, although that is probably no longer the case.
FreeBSD is for someone who will appreciate a simple, uncluttered unix. It's also an os that will require you to roll up your sleeves and make it the way you want it to be, which is less true of Linux nowadays with all the work that's gone into the install and user experience in the various distros.
I hope there is always a FreeBSD. It's reassuring to have a constant, simple, rock solid unix variant with a single vision of where its going. It's kind of like an old friend.