Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 17:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 503904
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-22
I sympathise with your view on this and your anxiety about lock in but I am not sure anything else is possible. All technology providers try to lock you into their ecosystems, those haven't taken that path simple die. Even the old fashioned printed text book vendors tried to lock people in by making their textbooks the obligatory set texts.
At least this way we get Apple's excellent design and ease of use, so students get to use tools that empower rather frustrate them and Apple does seem committed across the board to both pushing down content prices whilst leaving room for a viable business model for content makers. Plus the iBook Author app opens content creation to the many.
I presume that to compliment this new initiative (and to pull the ground from under the Windows 8 tablets, the Amazon Fire etc) it is likely that the iPad 3 launch will see the iPad 2 have a few minor upgrades and a price cut to become the new entry level low cost iPad. If Apple could get the iPad 2 down to $299 they kill most of what's left of the competition.
So I understand the unease but the actual effects, certainly in the short to medium term, look very positive.