Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 17:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 503923
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-08
I also don't agree with this, but unfortunely is how things work.
Back in the old days each OS had its own systems language. A bit like the mobile world nowadays.
One of the reasons POSIX was created, was because each UNIX vendor was happily adding their own ways of doing something.
Compiler vendors from standard approved languages add their own set of languages extensions, sometimes without real reason.
Each productivity application has its own data format, most of the time kept secret or under expensive NDAs.
Many more examples can be given and this is why what FSF stands for matters.
All the companies are there for the money. Being nice to the customers is only a by-product of being nice to their shareholders.
When you work within big corporations that becomes crystal clear.