Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th Jan 2012 17:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 504029
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-12-16
Exactly - because we all know that neither Microsoft or Google could not come close to the elegance that Apple will bring to this - and it's the elegance that will be transforming.
I would not object to some mythical company that could this as well as Apple has having the same system but sadly no such mythical company exists.
Is this way of going about such a project different to what we have seen before?
It seems to me a fairly common model which has not generated any sort of complaints before. Unreal for example gives away their Unreal Engine and tools for free. Make all the games you want, give your games away for free, but if you sell your games, Unreal wants a cut because you are benefitting from their technology. The iBook Author system is the same sort of deal.
Apple doesn't claim ownership of your content. You can still distribute your content on other stores if you use other tools. But if you use iBooks Author, you must distribute through the iBooks store if you want to make money off of it. "
PLAIN AND SIMPLE ! 10+