Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jan 2012 22:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 504497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Genghis Khan
Is Apple responsible for HP abandoning WebOS?
Is Apple responsible for the incorrect judgements made in the anti-Samsung lawsuits (since overturned)?
Is Apple responsible for ICS not being widely released well before Xmas?
Is Apple responsible for RIM's mismanagement?
Is Apple responsible for Nokia's mismanagement?
Is Apple responsible for WP7 development problems?
The answer to each and every one of these is a resounding no. Therefore Apple has been very, very lucky.
Next Xmas Apple won't have any of these misadventures to capitalise on.
Actually, you could make a case that Apple's influence had an impact on each one of those line items. So, the answer isn't a "resounding no". Apple has clearly disrupted the market all around causing problems for many companies trying to get a bite of those profits.