Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jan 2012 22:05 UTC, submitted by twitterfire
Permalink for comment 504936
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Lennie,
"Did you really mean SMTP when you talked about ASN.1 ?"
"Maybe you meant SNMP ?"
Sometimes I'm baffled at how I write the wrong thing sometimes. Yes I wrote an SNMP client for a legacy DOS system using pascal. And I found ASN difficult to use from such a statically structured language.
I haven't read anything indicating HTTP would become binary, but if it were to be I think a simple binary name/value container would do fairly well without much trouble.