Linked by lemur2 on Thu 26th Jan 2012 22:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 504954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Since it does a whole lot more than 3.5 ever did. So obviously some of the functionality from the few discarded % of code, have had less priority to be added back.
Seriously, KDE SC is something like 4-5 million lines of code, do you really think the KDE developer(they are not that many) designed, developed, tested and debugged all that code from scratch in the few years since KDE 3.5? For most, in their spare time at that.
It's true that the KDE developers are awesome, but they are not quite on that level of super humans.