Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jan 2012 20:39 UTC
General Unix Finally something really interesting to talk about. If you've used UNIX or any of its derivatives, you've probably wondered why there's /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin in the file system. You may even have a rationalisation for the existence of each and every one of these directories. The thing is, though - all these rationalisations were thought up after these directories were created. As it turns out, the real reasoning is pretty damn straightforward.
Permalink for comment 505309
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: why not / instead of /usr
by phoenix on Tue 31st Jan 2012 17:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: why not / instead of /usr"
phoenix
Member since:
2005-07-11

"It would make more sense to move everything from /usr to /, then the other direction.


The idea is that you can snapshot /usr seperately from /var, /etc, /boot, etc.
"

If /boot, /var, /home, and /usr are separate filesystems, then it means that / is also a separate filesystem. Why would snapshotting one filesystem be easier than snapshotting another filesystem? And why wouldn't you want to snapshot the application configuration files along with the applications (meaning, /etc along with apps under /)?

Reply Parent Score: 2