Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Feb 2012 19:15 UTC
Permalink for comment 506105
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-20
the windows 95 start button was badly designed in term of usability (putting the hit zone a few pixel from the corner was a bad idea).
And after a few installs the start menu could be a few screen in heights.
The windows XP menu mitigated with a search field, but still.
Personnally I don't think that mac OSX or iOS are good in that regards, and unfortunately windows 8 seems to be heading that direction.
I agree that the windows start is great for discoverability and less invasive than the "program manager", but perhaps a new path is the key to find a good replacement.