Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Feb 2012 00:09 UTC, submitted by moondevil
Permalink for comment 506589
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
They also wanted users to be able to use Windows Explorer and other utilities. And the desktop version of IE10 (which supports plugins like Flash; the Metro version of IE10 supports no plugins, relying purely on HTML5 for fancy stuff).
I look at it like this: They want Metro users to be able to drop down to a lower level where Windows Exploerer and whatnot can be run, just like today WIndows users can drop down to the command line to run certain utilities.
As for porting Office to Metro, the problem there is that WinRT only supports a subset of Win32. So a Metro version of Office would require a significant rewrite, that would take too long for the next release. Office 16 will probably be purely Metro, but there's not enough time to do it for Office 15.