Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Feb 2012 23:40 UTC
Legal "We learned on January 31 that Barnes & Noble had suffered a major setback in a patent-infringement lawsuit filed against the company by Microsoft. That day, an administrative law judge at the International Trade Commission had tossed out the company's key defense, that Microsoft was engaging in 'patent misuse' as part of a larger scheme to 'kill Android'. Today the full opinion has been made public." Microsoft's protection racket might be legal, but that doesn't make it moral. It's based on software patents, and is thus, by definition, morally reprehensible and sleazy.
Permalink for comment 507331
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by shmerl
by stabbyjones on Thu 16th Feb 2012 00:50 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by shmerl"
stabbyjones
Member since:
2008-04-15

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNj1dXi-z0M

One thing i never thought of, are these agreements related only to the US?

So let's say I buy a new Galaxy Nexus in Australia does Samsung still have to pay MS?

Reply Parent Score: 2