Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Feb 2012 23:36 UTC
Permalink for comment 507399
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
My meaning of benefit was the same that Harlan pointed out : as forced to add these interfaces for windows anyway producers will start putting them in android devices enmasse as well. That will enable upstream Linux support and lower the barrier for kernel upgrades.
The problem is that MS knows that as well. They talk about windows dedicated HW and may implement number of IP traps in those standards to make it impossible for open systems to embrace them. They don't have to look at Intel any more.
The designs will soon reach general public and work for finding assorted patents and relevant prior art should start NOW.
Google shoud have come up with this 2 years ago. This is an area where they seriously lab behind MS in os development.
Edited 2012-02-16 12:20 UTC