Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 16th Feb 2012 14:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 507517
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
I can also build source packages and install them manually if I really want to.
That's why Thom is talking about. Signed repositories are not bad in themselves, they only become a problem when users are solely able to install software from a single source without hassle.
I have a fedora install as well ... :|
I don't understand where the problem is coming from, developer X get Key Y and signs their applications with it ... users can install it ... I don't understand what the problem is.
I work in the software world with many crap bits of software and this lock-in in childs play compared to what I have to deal with ... I wish it was this easy to work around.
Edited 2012-02-16 20:52 UTC