Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2012 11:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 507885
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-19
And you think that direct democracy scales? Or that direct democracy is a good way of preserving freedoms in all scenarios?
The only scalable thing is stupidity - it has no limits.
And obviously there is the Power Distance Index and other cultural differences. But people that preach their beliefs onto others never care about "those silly things"... isn't it right, Mr Preacher?
And in no way I am for the American 2 party system, it's not representative and has more divisions than a multi-party system as a result(conservative/moderate/extreme on both sides).
In short, ideally a meritocracy would be the perfect system of government, but it implies either aristocracy, autocracy or everyone being on the same level of education/intellect. And we get back to the same utopian visions that Marx had about economic systems.