Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Feb 2012 17:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 508555
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-08
I disagree, but I suspect that I may have a very different focus than you. I neither need nor want all the ancillary tools. I just need a tool I can use to work with the code.
For me, it comes down to the editor. Visual Studio's editor sucks - it's extremely simplistic, and most of the extra bells and whistles (like autocompletion) really don't work well enough, or provide enough benefit over a really good text editor, to be worth the hassle.
Yes, I know that most of this is because C++ is a very difficult language to write tools for. That's really no excuse though - other tools, much newer and built with far fewer resources than Visual Studio, have managed far better.
For C++, Eclipse isn't very good. Granted.
However, for Java, Eclipse is far, far better than Visual Studio is for C#. So is NetBeans, and especially IntelliJ IDEA.
If you want a point of comparison - Resharper for Visual Studio was written by the same guys who made IDEA (a Java IDE). The idea was to bring features from IDEA into Visual Studio, presumably so they didn't have to write their own .Net IDE as well.
The features that Resharper adds are standard in IDEA, and are generally found in Eclipse and NetBeans as well.
No need to get angry at the guy, by the way. He actually sounds like he's done a lot of Java development, and was surprised by how primitive Visual Studio was in comparison. So was I, especially considering the glowing reputation that Visual Studio has.