Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Feb 2012 17:53 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless "Jobs called Android a 'stolen product', but theft can be a tricky concept when talking about innovation. The iPhone didn't emerge fully formed from Jobs's head. Rather, it represented the culmination of incremental innovation over decades - much of which occurred outside of Cupertino." Nothing particularly new in there for regular OSNews readers, but still handy to have it in one place.
Permalink for comment 508798
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by WorknMan
by Laurence on Tue 28th Feb 2012 14:33 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by WorknMan"
Member since:

I don't know, as I didn't own one. But the comparison articles back from early 2007 indicate that the iPhone was a significantly better experience. In pretty much every respect, the LG was just another phone, and wouldn't have been any kind of game changer, even if the iPhone hadn't been released.

Hmmm. You might be right. I guess we can only speculate.

Yeah, just like Windows Phone, I don't think it was all that great in the features department. But design-wise, it was a significant step ahead from anything that had come before it.

Windows Phone was only a step ahead of anything before the portable Windows range. In terms of it's position in the market - it was very much a mediocre release. Certainly less of a significant step forward than Prada was in it's time given that Prada was pioneering a number of new technologies and concepts (even if, arguably, they didn't do the greatest job on the final release). Where as MS were just reverting back to basics with heavy influences from established products.

Edited 2012-02-28 14:34 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2