Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 29th Feb 2012 00:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 509135
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-07-27
Hmm, that isn't entirely accurate. SATA predates consumer dual core processors by several years, and would have become 'popular' with or without the dual core processor.
I wouldn't use popular to describe the adoption rate of SATA either, because SATA is simply the successor to PATA, and after chipmakers decided to implement the standard ( before dual core procs ) and phase out PATA eventually, other device makers like motherboard and harddisk manufacturers had to adopt or die.