Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Mar 2012 22:21 UTC
Windows And thus, Microsoft bites itself in its behind with Metro. As you all surely know by now, the Metro environment in Windows 8, and its accompanying applications, need to follow a relatively strict set of rules and regulations, much like, say, applications on iOS. For one type of application, Metro has already proven to be too restrictive and limited: web browsers. Microsoft has had to define a separate application class [.docx] - aside from Metro and desktop applications - just to make third party web browsers possible for Windows 8.
Permalink for comment 510288
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

"Personally I think the best would be to allow WinRT to be fully used for desktop applications and give legacy status to Win32.

Metro will most likely suffer the same fate as Vista on the desktop.

From what I have read WinRT isn't a complete replacement for win32 yet and it is possible to create desktop applications using WinRT. The post I read a while back:

I am aware of it, but what I meant is that Microsoft would do better by fully supporting WinRT for the desktop and forgeting this Metro nonsense.

I do have Windows 8 + MSVC 2011 installed, and also
do Windows development, so I am quite aware how Windows 8 is shaping up.

Reply Parent Score: 3