Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Mar 2012 22:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 510310
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
... parts of public utilities, infrastructure; where it's just natural, efficient, lowers costs; and in return for servicing virtually whole of the population, also unprofitable parts, with stable prices.
Or spectrum, in a way - otherwise it would probably end up in mafia-like web of extortions and/or who can build the more powerful transmitters (or, really, jammers - so going back to extortions). Maybe also financial exchanges.
Or in general, network effects can be and are beneficial, especially where the infrastructure involved is very costly.
Properly regulated of course - EU fines are part of the process, that's this "separate thing" that I mentioned.
(yeah, sure, I sorta can do business with another power company and such ...but, really, this is just procedural cloak, hiding the nature of the situation, as part of those regulatory activities)