Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Mar 2012 19:37 UTC
Internet & Networking Ever since it became clear that Google was not going to push WebM as hard as they should have, the day would come that Mozilla would be forced to abandon its ideals because the large technology companies don't care about an open, unencumbered web. No decision has been made just yet, but Mozilla is taking its first strides to adding support for the native H.264 codecs installed on users' mobile systems. See it as a thank you to Mozilla for all they've done for the web.
Permalink for comment 510714
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: In through the back door.
by Beta on Thu 15th Mar 2012 14:26 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: In through the back door."
Beta
Member since:
2005-07-06

Even so, I assume that a new stream encoded with all the bells and whistles (of better quality than H.264) does not play if you have version 1.0 of the VP8 codec.

You assume an awful lot. The VP8 format hasn’t changed.

H.264 is successful because it's great for Digital TV, Digital Distribution of Movies/TV Shows, Blu-Ray, VVoIP (FaceTime is a great example), etc.

Which profile are you talking about now exactly? Hopefully you understand you’re taking about a group of encodings with different features which don’t run on all devices you just mentioned… it has the exact problem you just assumed WebM doesn’t have.

Every idiot on the web talks about this as if the rest of the industry doesn't matter.

Maybe if they weren’t busy filling comments with assumptions, real discussions about why it doesn’t matter would happen.

Reply Parent Score: 3