Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Mar 2012 22:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 510800
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-08
I'm not sure how far this idea can get in the US. Countries like Germany have laws that state what can legally be in a contract and what cannot. Remember: The thing between a user and his ISP is a contract. The content of this contract has to obey higher laws (e. g. federal law). For example, there is no way a contract that removes my human rights in exchange for ISP service can be legal. Such a clause would immediately disappear from the contract. So even if it was stated in the contract and signed by me, it would be fully meaningless, and there would be no way for the ISP to force me to give up my human rights by that contract.
Nothing that is against the law may be considered legal when agreed to in a contract. So even if you sign a contract to "allow" your ISP to decrypt your network traffic and to cancel your connection when they "think" you're "downloading potentially copyrighted software" and it's against the law, they are not allowed to do it.
Of course, that's my very individual interpretation of how a fair and educated legal system should deal with it; I'm not sure if it fits reality.