Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 15th Mar 2012 22:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 510861
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-09
We do have bittorrent peer-to-peer encryption implemented in most popular clients at the moment; even enabled by default in some. However, while protecting from simple traffic monitoring, it does not (or simply practically cannot) provide any form of peer authentication, hence it is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.
What I'm really curious about is - whether it is legal for ISPs to execute large scale network attacks on its users when it is clearly NOT in interest of national security?