Linked by Linux Review on Tue 20th Mar 2012 17:07 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source It's been a while since we caught up with Stallman. But a couple months ago we took a look around at what's happening with law, politics and technology and realized that he maybe perhaps his extremism and paranoia were warranted all along. So when we were contacted by an Iranian Linux publication and asked if we would like to publish an English translation of a recent interview they had done with Stallman, I thought that it was a particularly rich opportunity.
Permalink for comment 511442
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Re:
by kurkosdr on Wed 21st Mar 2012 16:04 UTC in reply to "RE: Re:"
Member since:

Most probably... he seems to me to have a large ego and good deal of vanity (strange vanity, but vanity nonetheless). Most infuriating to me, he goes out of his way to try and communicate in such a way as to make it appear that he has no ego and is completely community minded. I don't buy it.

Stallman is egoistic because he thinks that, just because he declared proprietary software to be "wrong" (never mind it's not really wrong if it doesn't come with DRM), the whole world has to agree with him. Otherwise, you are either a) brainwashed b) a pig who only cares about comfort and not "freedom" (never mind that no constitutional freedoms are violated by proprietary software) or c) on the payroll of some company making proprietary software (yeah, right).

Genuiely disagreeing with his ideology that proprietary software == wrong, simply because you do not really think it's wrong, is beyond Stallman's comprehension, because he is so egoistical.

If you release a piece of software as proprietary and that software becomes successful, he will badmouth you whenever given the chance, call you 'evil' and hold silly protests in front of your store (even if said software doesn't have DRM or user restrictions), until you agree with him and release it as open source ("free software"). Disagreeing with his ideology that "all software should be free" and still remain "good"/"non evil" is something egoistical Stallman cannot accept.


How so?

Because if you do decide to release some software as open source("free"), he acts as if it was your obligation anyway, instead or a warm thank you.

Edited 2012-03-21 16:17 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1