Linked by David Adams on Wed 21st Mar 2012 18:03 UTC, submitted by gogothebee
Permalink for comment 511536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-23
Hi pysiak
I learned that the difference between Open Source and Free Software is just philosophical.
Open Source does not just mean "here it is the source code"
In legal terms Open Source and Free Software shared the almost same use licenses. You can see that the software licenses that OSI consider Open Source are almost the same than the software licenses that the FSF consider Free Software.
Any close source driver, it is not open source. Any binary blob it is not open source. Just showing the source code and not describing its use license it is not open source.
Any discussion of what is better, open source or free software it is just philosophical and differ a lot from person to person, that I why I prefer just to stick with the legal terms and the rules you have to follow on each license.