Linked by Linux Review on Tue 20th Mar 2012 17:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 511551
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
His answer about how to earn a living on free software is mind-bogglingly short-sighted IMHO. His argument is that "most paid software development is custom"--whatever that means, I believe he is referring to custom-tailored software created for in-house use within an organization. Be that as it may, most *used* software is not custom -- it's mostly commercial software distributed on a large scale to the unwashed masses, at relatively cheap prices due to economies of scale. The only reason there are so many jobs in "custom" software despite its niche status is that the developers charge an arm and a leg for it to make up for the low number of licenses.
So given that the "non-custom" software is actually more important to 99% of users, what is Stallman's proposal to replace the proprietary model for said infinitely more useful non-custom software? hmmm???
Edited 2012-03-22 18:09 UTC