Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 23rd Mar 2012 15:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 511649
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
IBM especially in the 60s was a very different beast to Apple.
I have heard stories of people checking whether you socks were held up by garters under your trousers. IBM was very slow moving due to a lot of bureaucracy.
If I remember correctly the only reason IBM PC actually took off was because an outside somewhat radical department at IBM were tasked with it, because they said they could deliver in 1 year not 4 (which was the usual product lifecycle at the time).