Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Mar 2012 22:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 512083
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-03-11
I did not claim either of you were incorrect or otherwise, I was simply pointing out that your perception may be limited given how plenty of people do in fact sell their used equipment, e.g. some corporate purchase orders have resell value as a consideration parameter.
For example, I know plenty of people who purchase Apple HW because they assume its resale value will subsidize their next purchase/replacement. Does that meant every person buying a laptop cares about resale value? No.
* I assume that explains your exercise in comparing apples (global laptop sales) to oranges (a couple US-Based re-sellers) ;-) "
actually... They're both global figures. The USA only accounts for around 12% of that figure (if you want I can grab the link for that figure.) it is possible that the us is atypical but considering I'd have to be off by 5x the number of used laptops for my point, that most people don't consider laptop resale value, to be wrong.