Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 29th Mar 2012 10:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 512291
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-06
... a phone as large as the 5.3 inch note, but I really like my 4.5 inch Galaxy S II Skyrocket. Email, and web browsing are much easier than on the iPhone (can you say presbyopia). Screen size is sufficient to keep me on android and off of iOS, but I would likely be back on any iPhone with a +4 inch screen that came out.
I agree with the poster who said that AAPL was sticking with 3.5 inch because it maximized profit. The question is do you want a phone that maximizes AAPL's profit or your utility?
The market is changing, there is no longer a monolithic "smartphone" market. AAPL makes laptops in multiple sizes to fit the needs of multiple market segments. It will eventually do the same in the smart phone market.