Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 30th Mar 2012 20:33 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu Two years ago, Linux guru Caitlyn Martin argued that "Ubuntu is a Poor Standard Bearer for Linux" due to reliability issues. She said that "Other distributions have problematic releases but other major distributions do not have significant problems in nearly every release. Ubuntu does." In her follow-up piece "How Canonical Can Do Ubuntu Right: It Isn't a Technical Problem," she explained how "...the problem I am describing is probably rooted in policy or business decisions that have been made..." and she offered specific ideas on how Canoncial could address the situation. Are these criticisms valid today? Does Ubuntu offer good reliability? Does it deserve its mindshare as the representative of PC Linux?
Permalink for comment 512613
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Sat 31st Mar 2012 19:54 UTC
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

I always keep a Linux PC around, for the last few years it has run Ubuntu.

My problem with Ubuntu is that dist upgrades always go wrong. Stuff stops working, the package system breaks and on one occasion the entire GUI failed to start. Even though I stick to installing stuff from the Ubuntu software tool.

For some reason the audio system mixed up the speaker and mic volume settings, but after a few versions this got fixed. Shutting down the computer used to work, then it just froze the PC, again for a few versions and now it also works again.

Ah, and I was able to have these freaky video effects, but now it says my video card doesn't support it (while it did in the past).

Sometimes Ubuntu is like a box of chocolates I guess.

Reply Score: 2