
"The ARM architecture is growing in popularity and is expected to expand its reach beyond the mobile and 'small embedded' device space that it currently occupies. Over the next few years, we are likely to see ARM servers and, potentially, desktops. Fedora has had at least some ARM support for the last few years, but always as a secondary architecture, which meant that the support lagged that of the two primary architectures (32 and 64-bit x86) of the distribution. Recently, though, there has been
discussion of 'elevating' ARM to a primary architecture, but, so far, there is lots of resistance to a move like that."
Member since:
2011-05-12
Whoever suggested this change needs their head examined. http://tinyurl.com/pxrfyp
Looking at the article, I don't think the discussion is whether to make ARM the primary architecture, but a primary architecture.
Fedora already officially have two primary level archtectures (x86 and x86_64) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures so this would just be adding a third.
Edited 2012-04-04 08:11 UTC