Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Wed 4th Apr 2012 06:45 UTC
Fedora Core "The ARM architecture is growing in popularity and is expected to expand its reach beyond the mobile and 'small embedded' device space that it currently occupies. Over the next few years, we are likely to see ARM servers and, potentially, desktops. Fedora has had at least some ARM support for the last few years, but always as a secondary architecture, which meant that the support lagged that of the two primary architectures (32 and 64-bit x86) of the distribution. Recently, though, there has been discussion of 'elevating' ARM to a primary architecture, but, so far, there is lots of resistance to a move like that."
Permalink for comment 512814
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by EvaTheDog
by d3vi1 on Wed 4th Apr 2012 11:40 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by EvaTheDog"
Member since:

Fedora already officially have two primary level archtectures (x86 and x86_64) according to so this would just be adding a third.

And a forth. And soon enough a fifth. You have ARMv5 and ARMv7 and you should soon enough have a new 64-bit ARM ARMv8. This complicates things a bit. Furthermore, it's hard to support a distribution for ARM given that there are no generic ARM systems available yet.

Every configuration for almost every ARM system should be hardcoded at compile-time and if you're planning to support 100 different ARM systems might find out that you need 100 kernels.

Linux needs to auto-detect the hardware available to it such as frame buffers, i/o devices, etc. Most ARM systems out there (mobile phones for example), don't have any auto-detection features and only work with hardcoded defaults and this just won't work.

Future ARM systems will work just right with Fedora as they will be closer to following a standard. They will use UEFI as a firmware, they will have a standard PCI bus, etc.

Right now I don't think that Fedora on ARM is doable but I applaud their attempt to make it happen.

Reply Parent Score: 5