Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Apr 2012 17:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 513242
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-28
This is going to be a very grey area when you do that to an entire book. Had the books been formatted differently and used different examples there would be no case. The statement I made was a comment on the legal system and what is allowed. I think this work will be lost and efforts would have been better spent making good textbooks without coping the feel and layout.
Although for the intended purpose when an instructor says turn to page 120 and lets read that then discuss it does have to be similar.
I'm not pro-copyright or anything I will not respect copyright until the original constitutional time-frame is restored.